Monthly Archives: April 2008

Competition, cooperation, and compassion all play a part in free market systems–and the use of these traits can be explained with an economic analogy to the biological science of evolution, according to Michael Shermer’s latest book, The Mind of the Market. That’s good news and bad news for humanists.

The good news is that the bulk of this book recounts truly fascinating experiments and discoveries regarding physiological components of our market decisions. Using fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) of the brain, we discover that playing fair and treating each other well may be hard-wired into all but the sociopathic few. Shermer’s conclusion may even leave many humanists applauding, as he sounds a clear call for all of us to decide to behave humanely.

Some of the ethical dilemma exercises in Mind of the Market were familiar to me, but it was intriguing to read what brain scans show about the physiological effects of making certain decisions. I also found it eye-opening to read that my own propensity to cry at the slightest sentimentality in a movie, as well as my aversion to risk-taking in my retirement investments, may both be physiologically triggered.

Now for the bad news. Shermer promotes a free market that permits the cheapest goods to make it into the hands of consumers, and he chastises limitations such as antitrust laws and tariffs on foreign goods. But an entirely free market may not be the panacea Shermer claims it to be. Consumers are also producers. When laborers work for less than subsistence wages, they can’t purchase the goods being sold.

The economic equations in Mind of the Market focus on the bottom line; that is, they fail to account for non-economic factors. For example, Shermer cites a statement by economist Daniel Klein that, “all the economic reasons favor school vouchers.” While it may be less expensive to educate a student with unlicensed nuns in a parochial school, we have guaranteed, through public schools, that we will support secular education using licensed educators even though the cost may be higher. We must factor into the equation the difference between supporting someone’s religious training with government funds, and simply assuring students the ability to attain basic knowledge of the world.

The epilogue of Shermer’s book betrays earlier pages showing the effect of environment on an individual’s psychological disposition. Shermer leads us to deduce that the masses will fare terrifically in a totally free market because we are all predisposed to make decisions that benefit each other. However, both wealth and poverty are affected more by luck of birth than by what choices we make. Sure, we choose how to respond to our circumstances, but the choices available to an heiress like Paris Hilton are quite different from the choices available to the homeless man who sells me Street Sense newspaper twice a month.

These negatives aside, there is more for a humanist to love about the book than there is to dislike. Shermer’s style is accessible and easy, filled with fun analogies and a smattering of funny lines, especially if, like me, you feel compelled to read footnotes. I can even overlook Shermer’s bizarre habit of describing the physical attributes of the scientists to whom he refers. (I suppose this is his attempt to humanize geekdom.)

I certainly encourage humanist readers to get beyond the discomfort of the initial charge to look at economics as an overlapping science with evolution. We can all take comfort in the possibility that cooperation and altruism may be based in evolutionary needs. Shermer’s book might even provide a source for possible answers to theists’ who query, “Without a god-belief, what makes you moral?”

Lori Lipman Brown is the director of the Secular Coalition for America, the first Congressional lobbying organization explicitly representing the interests of nontheistic Americans.

May / June 2013

May / June 2013


March / April 2013

March / April 2013


January / February 2013

January / February 2013


November / December 2012

November / December 2012


September / October 2012

September / October 2012


July / August 2012

July / August 2012


May / June 2012

May / June 2012


March / April 2012

March / April 2012


January / February 2012

January / February 2012


November / December 2011

November / December 2011


September / October 2011

September / October 2011


July / August 2011

July / August 2011


May / June 2011

May / June 2011


March / April 2011

March / April 2011


January / February 2011

January / February 2011


November / December 2010

November / December 2010


September / October 2010

September / October 2010


July / August 2010

July / August 2010


May / June 2010

May / June 2010


March / April 2010

March / April 2010


January / February 2010

January / February 2010


November / December 2009

November / December 2009


September / October 2009

September / October 2009


July / August 2009

July / August 2009


May / June 2009

May / June 2009


March / April 2009

March / April 2009


January / February 2009

January / February 2009


November / December 2008

November / December 2008


September / October 2008

September / October 2008


July / August 2008

July / August 2008


May / June 2008

May / June 2008


March / April 2008

March / April 2008


January / February 2008

January / February 2008


November / December 2007

November / December 2007


September / October 2007

September / October 2007


July / August 2007

July / August 2007


May / June 2007

May / June 2007