Monthly Archives: February 2012

I see humanism as having four dimensions; the intrapersonal, the interpersonal, the societal, and the global. We may gravitate toward one dimension or another, but a mature humanism asks us to consider all the dimensions that make up a balanced, whole, humanist lifestance. Here I will focus on the intrapersonal life, which is experiential, emotional, and reflective.

Existentialists like Sartre recommended we be concerned with existence before essence. Consider the statement: “All humans are mortal.” It sounds perfectly rational and true. Now consider, “I am mortal,” which hits a bit closer to home. Lastly, think of what it is to say, “I’m dying.” Note we have moved from the factual, rational, and abstract essence of things, to the personal, emotional, and existential aspects of our being. Many times we get caught up in scientific understanding of the world, but when dealing with the reflective nature of our consciousness we are dealing with truths that have no empirical verification. In other words, there’s no way I can prove I love my wife, suffer shame, or experience ecstasy, but these truths can be more important than the empirically based truths we normally attribute to a reasoned humanist life.

A common criticism of humanists is that, as head-only rationalists, we miss the experiential aspects of religion. I beg to differ. We know that religion survives and thrives based on impulses dictated both by nature and nurture. Certainly humanists resist giving in to the genetic impulse toward supernaturalism, but also toward tribalism, racism, sexism, and authoritarianism amplified by our culture. Even so, there are impulses we can choose to enhance that nurture religion, but are also useful in meeting our goals for a full humanist life. Some might call these the “spiritual” aspects of humanism, which to me is too broad and misleading a term to describe the spectrum of the myriad individual impulses that are unifying and invigorating to human experience.

We don’t need a minister to tell us that we’re missing the awe and wonder of God if we find transcendence not in a mystical ritual but in the emotional experience of an infant’s smile, a hike through deep woods, or when falling in love. We find meanings and purpose, not in a hereafter, but in reverence for simply being part of this amazing world where only we can create meaning and purpose.

Beyond living in the shallows of experience, we can work to become more mindful of the deepest dimensions of what it means to be human: To rejoice and to feel pain, doubt, and fear. To allow joy, love, and ecstasy to animate our lives. Our wounds and joys are in fact what make us fully human.

Socrates likened our inner lives to a chariot pulled by the twin horses of emotion and appetite, and controlled by the rider reason. The horses need some freedom, but the rider must control the chariot’s direction and speed. Similarly, Nietzsche spoke of the Apollonian—the cool, rational and controlled—as opposed to the Dionysian—wild, emotional, and orgiastic. The glory of humanism is that it pulls from both the Enlightenment and the Romantic traditions, balancing heart and mind, reason and compassion. Critical reasoning can blend with our romantic longings.

Our genetic impulses also call us to transformative awareness. Neuroscientist Michael Gazzaniga postulates a mental narrating module he calls the “Interpreter” in the left hemisphere of the brain that makes up stories or interpretations of our experience. In the Stone Age, a father sitting around the campfire looking up at the stars made up explanations to his children that became our religious stories, whereas the humanist looks to reason and science to explain the world. Those deep connections, explanations, and experiences, along with a sense of wholeness and oneness with the universe are what humanism can offer our inner lives.

Michael Werner is past president of the American Humanist Association and remains active in many humanist organizations.

 

May / June 2013

May / June 2013


March / April 2013

March / April 2013


January / February 2013

January / February 2013


November / December 2012

November / December 2012


September / October 2012

September / October 2012


July / August 2012

July / August 2012


May / June 2012

May / June 2012


March / April 2012

March / April 2012


January / February 2012

January / February 2012


November / December 2011

November / December 2011


September / October 2011

September / October 2011


July / August 2011

July / August 2011


May / June 2011

May / June 2011


March / April 2011

March / April 2011


January / February 2011

January / February 2011


November / December 2010

November / December 2010


September / October 2010

September / October 2010


July / August 2010

July / August 2010


May / June 2010

May / June 2010


March / April 2010

March / April 2010


January / February 2010

January / February 2010


November / December 2009

November / December 2009


September / October 2009

September / October 2009


July / August 2009

July / August 2009


May / June 2009

May / June 2009


March / April 2009

March / April 2009


January / February 2009

January / February 2009


November / December 2008

November / December 2008


September / October 2008

September / October 2008


July / August 2008

July / August 2008


May / June 2008

May / June 2008


March / April 2008

March / April 2008


January / February 2008

January / February 2008


November / December 2007

November / December 2007


September / October 2007

September / October 2007


July / August 2007

July / August 2007


May / June 2007

May / June 2007